BTA provides an understanding of your biochemistry

In doing so, the BTA provides an understanding of your biochemistry, your internal biological terrain. It is not diagnostic for any specific pathology or disease states. Rather, the test data can impart objective analytical guideposts about the lymphatics and liver systems, the kidneys, and the blood itself. It also imparts knowledge about various bodily functions before any pathology develops. Read more

Detoxification

The most commonly overlooked aspect of nutritional approaches is detoxification. Most doctors fall into the habit of only detoxifying the organ or system that is evident from superficial diagnostic techniques. We often stop before asking how and why the body acquired and maintains an abundance of toxins or pathological organisms.

This relates back to the functional tests and the biological terrain. The most lucid explanation of biological terrain is derived from the work of Enderlein, M.D. using darkfield microscopy. The insight gained from understanding his approach gives you an idea of the severity of the condition and estimates not only the types of therapy that will need to be employed, but also the duration one can expect before health is rejuvenated. The stages of health are outlined into 6 progressive "Reckeweg" phases. Continue Reading >>

Biological Terrain Analysis (BTA)

This simple test, Biological Terrain Assessment, or BTA 2000, costs about $150 and analyzes small amounts of blood, urine, and saliva to provide data about the current state of the building blocks of the body - your enzymes, amino acids, molecules, cells, and electrons. When you know how the chemistry of your body Is functioning, you can make lifestyle adjustments that support improvements in health. What is exciting about this particular test is its ability to pick up prepathological changes in the body that predispose one to bacterial and viral infections, as well as many chronic diseases.

BTA is a powerful health screening instrument that provides valuable biochemical information about cellular function and cellular metabolism in the tissues, organs, and systems of the body. This includes such data as oxygen transport, nutrient delivery, waste removal, mineral retention, cellular absorption, and multiple metabolic chemical interactions. Continue Reading >>

The Fairy Tale of E-coli Causing Sickness and Death

This was an email sent to me today concerning E-coli from spinach causing sickness or even death. It came as a result, I am quite sure, of the AOL news coverage and the hour-long CNN documentary which has been running all weekend about the spinach scare in 2006, farming practices, the problems of the FDA, the wrongly theorized cause, the supposed remedies, and lawsuits and so on.

It also highlighted the death of an elderly woman and the near-death of a little girl. I am always a bit suspicious and fearful of news media, like politicians, who spend too much time telling me what to be afraid of and who to blame." This is especially true when most of the accompanying ads seem to be from the pharmaceutical industry.

I am sharing with you my thoughts and response to questions. The host and interviewer of the piece was Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN's medical correspondent.

Here is the email letter:
"Dear Dr. Young "I was just wondering if the "germ" finds a friendly environment (over acidic), can it multiply and create more waste and therefore there is a possibility of exposure that leaves an acidic body in jeopardy.

"Obviously E-coli has been used for ages in classrooms (because it doesn't take much to provide it with the necessary ingredients for quick replication for observation) without hurting anyone, but if for some reason, some crazy kid decided to lick his slide and the internal terrain was compromised already, would the e-coli (or any other bacteria) then be able to replicate internally and produce enough waste to tip the balance (though I would have thought it would take ages)? Or is that really out of the question? Clearly the focus is bas-ackwards (as they say) in western etiology.

"When a group of kids who have been mistakenly identified as being "struck" by E-coli from a bad meat source, is it simply that the "'bad" (is there any good? : ) meat has become so acidic that it is like drinking industrial solvents? Would chemical tests of the suspect sources reveal the problem? Biological interpretations appear to be just wrong.
"Thank you so much for taking the time to answer these!"
Sally

Dear Sally: Thank you for your email questions. I have stated in my writings that germs (the "germing" process) cannot cause disease but "germs" themselves do produce digestive (enzymes) or metabolic waste products called exotoxins and mycotoxins or simply acids that contribute to disease states.

I have further stated that there is only one cause of sickness, dis-ease and death and that is the over acidification of the tissues (latent tissue acidosis) and then blood (compensated acidosis and then decompensated acidosis) due to an inverted way of living, eating and thinking.

Your question of whether or not bacteria can cause disease is an important question that has been debated for over 100 years. As you know, the French scientist, Antione BeChamp, an adversary of Louis Pasteur, said, "the germ is nothing; the terrain is everything."

Maintaining the healthy alkaline environment or terrain of the human body is critical for good health and for the prevention of any disease. The human body is alkaline by design and acidic by function. That is, the body is designed to run on primarily alkaline fuel because all bodily functions create acids which must be largely neutralized to protect the body itself from the acidic creation of disease and dis-ease.

The body maintains this alkaline pH design at 7.365 by eliminating gastrointestinal and metabolic acids through urination, perspiration, defecation and respiration. When we eat anything, including highly alkaline spinach, there will be residues of acids that can be easily buffered from the sodium bicarbonate produced and released in the stomach. So what comes first the bacteria or the acid? What we have here is the chicken or the egg scenario. I would suggest to you that everything is the prey of life and nothing is the prey of death. What can be nourished can be consumed and everything is simply trying to live.

Since our bodies run on energy in the form of electrons, the by-products of energy consumption is always acid. When acids from the process of metabolism are not properly eliminated, they can spoil our cells that make up our tissues that then gives rise to biological transformations known as bacteria.

So the answer to the question, "what comes first the bacteria or the acid?" the answer is clearly the ACID. Acid is the bi-product of energy being used or consumed. Bacteria is then a by-product of energy being consumed like the smoke from a fired gun, of spoiling or degenerating matter not the cause of the spoiling or degenerating matter. ACID is the only cause for spoiling of degenerating matter or tissue! In today's headline on AOL News it said, "Two More Deaths Possibly Linked to Tainted Spinach." A key word in this headline is "possibly" which infers that scientific investigators just don't know! And I believe that they know that they don't know. But they are going to try and calm your fears--and so they are going to come up with some sort of explanation that they can sell to the public.

But I am convinced that tainted or fermenting spinach which would contain very little amounts of oxalic acid and not enough to make one sick and it would ordinarily be neutralized by the sodium bicarbonate secreted in the mouth, stomach and intestines. Why? Because if spinach is that tainted or fermenting it would have a terrible smell, a terrible taste, and unlikely that anyone in their right mind would eat it. States of ultimate sickness, disease and then death comes as a process of poor lifestyle and dietary choice that then lead to a state of over acidity. The oxalic acid from a few leaves of Spinach could not possibly shut down the kidneys.
Now consider this: Most people get their spinach from sealed plastic bags designed to keep the spinach fresh for awhile. My bet would be that of the 250 or so spinach leaves in that one bag, NO SINGLE LEAF came from even the same plant. By the time the leaves are separated from the plant, washed and rewashed, tumbled and tossed, run over the multiple conveyer belts, those leaves came from all over the farm field, and sometimes from different truck loads and possibly even different fields--all in the same bag at your grocery store.

Have you ever seen the size of those commercial spinach fields? They look like a square mile or bigger. And there is field after field after field. Perhaps we are sophisticated enough to track a bag from the consumer, back to the store, back to the packager, and back to the commercial farmer, and maybe even back to one or two farm fields. But the chance that the FDA or any governmental agencies is sophisticated enough to isolate e-coli down to a few plants or area of a field is beyond my comprehension and certainly my confidence in the U.S. government.
In that enormous field, whatever they found, it is my guess that they would have found approximately the same thing anywhere in the field. And they could go next farm over and find the same results. Thousands of bacteria are everywhere as a product of evolution and a stage of life transforming.

You say the spinach field was too close to a field of cattle? Have you ever driven through California or most other states and looked at the farms? There are thousands of cattle fields and hog farms in proximity to fields of trees, plants and vegetables. There's e-coli everywhere. You have had plenty of e-coli come and go in your body. Fifteen million e-coli bacteria can sit on the head of a pin. I also believe that a hundred thousand people ate spinach leaves from the same field, and if there was some E-coli present, thousands and thousands of people ate those leaves and did not get sick.

What I do know and what I do believe is that many people could conceivable had perhaps some miniscule amount of bacteria, as we all do, from whatever source, and yet, the blood cells, tissues, and rivers/fluids of these peoples' bodies were acidic to begin with.

This internal-external distinction is important because it helps us in the treatment of the dis-ease as we change our focus from the bacteria to the state of over-acidity pH versus the actual alkaline pH of the fluids of the body. And if someone is taken to the hospital with whatever symptoms, they are then treated with a myriad of acidic components, including antibiotics, adding fuel to a fire already started. Rather than using acidic drugs to kill some harmless bacteria, the focus should change to reestablishing the alkaline internal pH environment with alkaline buffers such as sodium bicarbonate.

But hospitals do not do that because they are operating from the same wrong-headed theory as are many governments of the world, U.S. health agencies, medical schools, research laboratories, and lastly the 1,000 pound pharmaceutical gorillas that--along with your tax dollars--fund the whole she-bang.

To suggest that those individuals died from E-coli found in the kidney is like blaming the smoke from a fired gun as the cause of death. Logically we know that smoke from a fired gun cannot kill. We can even argue that it is not the bullet that can kill. It is the person that is pulling the trigger that causes the gun to be fired that causes the release of the bullet and then the residue of smoke. E-coli is the smoke. The bullet is the acid. And the triggering factor is the individual's lifestyle and dietary choices.

Not for a moment do I believe that anyone, unless staving to death, would eat spoiled fermenting smelly and awful tasting spinach. I do not believe that people are that silly, and I am not about to believe the ridiculous claims that spinach was the possible cause of death as suggested by western germ theory scientists. To justify their claims, these medical savants are now saying that E-coli is the possible villain in this fairy tale by suggesting that it is coming from migrant workers who are urinating and defecating in the fields around the spinach, or the nearby cattle and their excrement, or the pig farm, or the water run off that soaked an area of the field.

I can hardly contain myself from laughing out loud when organic farmers are using chicken excrement to fertilize the fields of spinach and other vegetables and fruits, and it certainly is not all "treated" fertilizer. Here at Rancho del Sol, we have used chicken excrement in and around our organic grapefruit and avocado trees for its oxygen and nitrogen components. This is what all organic farmers use. So what would be worse, human excrement or chicken excrement used to fertilize? The point is, we must focus on the cause not the effect and the cause will always be where you find the poison, or the acid, not the "germ" or the "germing process". As for Legionnaire's disease this also is not caused by bacteria. It is caused from over indulging in acidic foods and drinks. And plenty ate the same food and didn't get sick. And there are plenty of those who were sick that had been diagnosed with Legionnaire's where no bacteria could be found. The reason? Acid makes us sick not bacteria.

This is also the case with individuals diagnosed with HIV/AIDS. They are sick but there is no virus present! So what is the cause? It can only be from an over acidic environment. So, we need to look at the acid from our lifestyle and dietary choices.

The acid from the beverages we drink such as tea, coffee and alcohol. The toxins from meats that release nitric, uric, sulfuric, and phosphoric acids. Or the toxins from sugar like acetlyaldehyde or lactic acids. These are the true culprits or poisons that make us sick, tired and fat that lead to our eventual death. Finally you asked the following questions: The first was...I was just wondering that when the germ finds a friendly environment (over acidic), can it multiply and create more waste and therefore is there a possibility of exposure that leaves an acidic body in jeopardy. The word "germ" comes from the German language which means to sprout or germinate. Allow me to digress a moment. Germs are not really nouns, even though we think of them as "things" but they are not; "germ" should be a verb--or a noun derived from a verb. I think it should be a gerund if I remember my English correctly. A word that ends in "ing." It's not a thing so much as it's an activity. It should be called "germing." Instead we say germination and germinating.

"Germs" are the germinating function of changing matter and are NOT species specific, that is, they do note mate or reproduce. The reality is that germs are not things but actions or reactions from a changing environment. The germ or germination or germing is the expression of that change in matter and should never be classified. Simply, E-coli is a stage of transforming matter and not a reproduction due to an over acidic environment.

E-coli is the change of matter or tissue in a changed environment that is pH sensitive. It is no different than taking water, a liquid and seeing the change that takes place when we change the temperature to zero degrees Celsius and the water changes to ice, a solid. It is still water but in a different form. And so it is with E-coli. E-coli is a form of matter that is born out of the cell when the pH of the environment becomes acidic.

The second question was...obviously E-coli has been used for ages in class rooms (because it doesn't take much to provide it with the necessary ingredients for quick replication for observation) without hurting anyone, but if for some reason some crazy kid decided to lick his slide and the internal terrain was compromised already, would the e-coli (or any other bacteria) then be able to replicate internally and produce enough waste to tip the balance (though I would have thought it would take ages)? Or is that really out of the question? Clearly the focus is bas-ackwards (as they say) in western etiology? Once again germs cannot cause disease even if the child licks the slide. This experiment was done many years ago when Claude Bernard a French physiologist drank a glass of cholera bacteria with little affect other than some nausea. In fact, to prove my point I am willing to eat E-coli on fresh spinach leaves for CNN if they are willing and ready for the TRUTH! Another question was....when a group of kids who have been mistakenly identified as being "struck" by E-coli from a bad meat source, is it simply that the "bad" meat has become so acidic that it is like drinking industrial solvents? Industrial solvents differ greatly, but yes, depending upon some variables, eating any meat is highly acidic and would be like drinking industrial solvent, assuming their quantities and other factors were similar. Another question was....would chemical tests of the suspect sources reveal the problem?

Yes, if tested you would find an increase of specific acids in the suspected sources. Question....are biological interpretations....just wrong? You are right in your suspicions. Biological interpretation is wrong because scientists are focused on the matter rather than focused on the environment around the matter. It comes back to the fish bowl metaphor. When the fish is sick, do you treat the fish or change the water? Western medical science is focused on the fish, treats the fish and then neglects to clean up the environment not realizing that the fish is only as healthy as the environment it is swimming in.

This is true with the fluids of our body. If we find E-coli in the tissues, this is a transformation of the tissues due to the acidic fluids found in and around that tissue. There is no infection, only an outfection of matter giving birth to bacteria due to fluid acidosis. The key to staying healthy is to eat fresh organic greens whenever possible, to build healthy blood, and to help maintain the alkaline pH design of our body.

That includes eating lots of fresh organic spinach! Stay away from the acidic foods, liquids, supplements, and treatments. And especially stay away from those faulty or "acidic" theories of western scientific thought that are based upon a false belief that "germs" cause disease -- it could kill you. This fairy tale of E-coli causing sickness and death is just over the top, it smells of big money, and I see lots of dubious irradiation cost and solutions just down the road. Kindest Regards, Robert O. Young Ph.D.

After 25 years of research studying the affects lifestyle and diet on the pH of the blood

After 25 years of research studying the affects lifestyle and diet on the pH of the blood, I have learned that the human organism is alkaline by design and acidic in all of its functions. If one can maintain the delicate alkaline pH of all the body fluids bathing every cell from within and from without at 7.365 then life will continue without pain, suffering, sickness or disease.

Louis Pasteur's germ theory has become a curse. Antoine BeChamp an adversary to Pasteur and his germ theory for scientific fraud said this about the germ theory, "there is nothing so false that does not contain some element of truth, and so it is with the germ theory."

The germ theory is the controlling medical idea for the world. In Pasteur's day, and ever since, other proposed theories about the cause of disease have fallen on death ear because they have tended to contradict that paradigm. NO matter how simple and logical an idea about the cause of disease, if it does not promote the concept of invasion of germs and their specific cures it does not fit into the medical paradigm.

More importantly, the germ theory has become a curse because it has encouraged individuals to give up responsibility for their own health over to the medical community. If germs cause disease it stands to reason that control belongs to the medical community whose tireless researchers spend trillions of our money to find the right pill or potion to annihilate disease-causing germs.

This quest to cure disease through medication is at the heart of modern allopathic medicine and the multi-trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry. It is a quest that persists despite evidence indicating that airborne germs do not cause the disease for which they are credited.

After more than a century of trying, the Pasteurian germ theory has utterly failed in the quest to a cure for any disease. All major degenerative diseases are on the increase, as are so called infectious diseases which are not infectious at all. Every year, old symptoms are given new names - names like MS for polio, AIDS for poor sanitation, poor nutrition, poor lifestyle choices and drug use, Epstein-Barr virus for connective tissue disorders like fibramyalgia - to make them appear to be the work of a new germ. Unless we turn this nonsense around, the human race could become extinct like the dinosaurs from the treatments of modern medicine to kill a non- threatening or phantom germ.

If we want to find the cure for disease we need only to look at our dietary and lifestyle choices. If you heed the ignored, even rejected discoveries of Pasteur's peers and scientists of the 19th and 20th century, adding those to my own discoveries, you will learn the true cause of disease.
Until the medical community starts looking at causes rather than devoting its time looking for cures, and until we start taking responsibility for our own lifestyle and dietary choices, I believe the human race is in trouble of becoming extinct.

Dr. Benjamin Rush, Physician and signer of the Declaration of Independence, 1776 said this: "Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize itself into an undercover dictatorship, To restrict the art of healing to one class of men and deny equal privileges to others will constitute the bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic."

Where does life begin? In the womb or the grail, the holy grail, in the amniotic fluid, in a 98.6 F, one percent water and salt solution or 1 part salt to 100 parts water. This solution is called the sol. This natural salt solution, called "sol" is from the origin of the word, directly connected to the word "soul". What we call "sol" for our salt solution (a solution of two in one- no more polarity), was believed by the ancient Celtics to represent our soul, as the soul originated, in their belief, from the ocean where we are all born from the same fluids, arising from the same "sol" a solution of salt and water.

Our body in its wholeness is an ingenious creation of nature, It has been given all mechanisms to not only sustain its life but also to create new life. Every healthy person has innate regulatory mechanisms to maintain its alkaline design and self-healing powers, which ensure or reestablish the natural balance of the bodily functions, the homeostasis.

It is not the doctor that heals us, nor the medication, but our own innate alkaline regulatory mechanisms. Our body is able to fully regenerate itself. Therefore, it is advised to use great discernment before labeling any disease as "incurable" or "untreatable." If doctors come to the conclusion that a disease in incurable, they would be more accurate in saying that with their knowledge and experience, they are not able to offer any further help. The word "incurable" conveys fear, or false evidence appearing real, which stifles and weakens our body's innate alkaline mechanism.

Bio-chemically speaking Health is all about alkaline balance. Bio-energetically speaking Health is all about energy. Vibrating energy is the origin of matter and the origin of life. And matter is nothing more than organized energy.

In 1984, the Swiss physicist Dr. Carlos Rubbia, received the Nobel prize for discovering a mathematically calculable natural constant with which he could calculate the ratio of mass particles (matter) in relation to navigating energy particles, The ratio of matter to energy that forms matter is 1 to 9,746 to the power of 108 or about 1 to 1,000,000,000 which means it takes one billion energy units to create one single unit of matter in a materialized tangible form.

Isn't interesting that we for the most part, preoccupy ourselves with only 1 billionth part of reality: that which is in a material form and can be seen and touched. We fail to see the far greater amount of energy particles it took to materialize our reality. This revolutionary scientific discovery shows us clearly that every form of matter is subject to higher energetic interactions and subject to change of form and function.

When we analyze the energy content of any form of matter, we arrive at its smallest part, the atom and its protons, electrons and neutrons. There is ongoing movement without any contact- nothing tangible, just pure vibrating energy. This vibrating energy creates a frequency, which can be measured, a so-called wave length which can be seen using my photon interference photography. Every form of matter is characterized as a specific frequency spectrum.

And each frequency spectrum can be measured using a decibel meter. All organized matter is nothing more than organized energy that gives off a specific frequency and a specific sound which can be measured and heard. When we turn on a light or an electrical device we can see the energy but we cannot perceive the electrical current itself, but we except its existence.

This same materially non-perceivable electricity, this energy, flows through our body fluids especially our blood. Every one of us has enough measurable electrical cu rrent flowing through us to light up a 100 watt light bulb.

Life/light = energy and energy = information or intelligence. Everything that exists not only exists as energy but also as a carrier of information or intelligence, whether it is a human being, a form of food or drink, or a rock. Life is a constant exchange of energy and intelligence and the best place to view this life energy is in the live and dried blood.

Plasma which is 92% water is a good example for showing how matter as energy is transformed when additional energy is added or subtracted. Water has three different distinct bodies or states: solid, liquid and gaseous. Ice is frozen water or like the thickening of the blood.

We can see it and feel its coolness. By adding energy in the form of heat to the ice it transforms back into a liquid. When we add more energy to the water it begins to boil and the molecules start moving faster and faster that they begin to transform into steam and become gaseous. This transformation of organized energy as matter from one form to another is know as biological or energetical transformation or also referred to as pleomorphism.

Energy and intelligence are identical.
Every form of energy has a specific wavelength
Every wavelength has its individual content of intelligence
There are no accidents in the order of Nature

Meanwhile, we know of about 40,000 different diseases and the list is growing that are treated by the 1,200 different allopathic specialty fields with 58,000 different kinds of allopathic preparations or medicines. However, the word diseases in the plural form, is not a accurate.

Have you ever heard of "healths"? We are either healthy or ill. This illness signals a lack of energy and shows up in the form of a symptom. To represent a symptom as an illness is technically and scientifically inaccurate. The symptom is merely the intelligent cry of the energetically defective and suffering body, crying out for help. And normally, the body turns to a weakened organ to give us a hint, through a symptom, that things are not in order.

Our bodies either hum or honk Upset stomachs or high blood pressure or high blood sugars is the body honking. The honks of our bodies are telling us there is a state of pH or energetic imbalance.

Why does pH balance or pH Homeostasis define good health?
pH balance or pH homeostasis in humans commonly refers to the internal balance of the body's electro-magnetic and chemical systems in response to the changing conditions of the external world and the changing conditions of the internal world.

The word homeostasis comes from the Greek words: "homeo" means similar or "alki" or "alkaline" and "stasis" means a tendency toward maintaining stability. There are many homoeostatic mechanisms in our bodies that help maintain this balance and our state of health is directly related to the health of these mechanisms. pH homeostasis is maintained by dynamic processes of feedback and regulation.

pH homeostasis has only one objective: to preserve the beneficial conditions of life in the internal alkali environment. Every day we are bombarded with external influences that threaten that balanced internal alkaline pH environment. Some of these threats include becoming too hot or too cold, eating too much or eating acidic foods or drinks, breat hing polluted air and being exposed to chemicals over a period of time.

Our cells, especially the red blood cells can only survive when our bodies are strong enough to maintain pH homeostasis or to regain it quickly after we have been exposed to toxic environmental threats. Some of the pH homoeostatic mechanisms in the body include temperature regulation, dilation of the eye, blood composition, heart rate, blood pressure, water content, blood sugar level, mineral relationships, and of course the acid/alkaline balance of our body fluids. An essential feature of these mechanisms is that they enable the red blood cells, the tissue which is a product of the red blood cells and the whole of the organism, also a product of blood, to adapt to changes in both internal and external environmental conditions.

If the pH homoeostatic mechanisms are impaired the body loses its ability to regulate these mechanisms. By looking at living blood using a compound microscope we can view the quality of the red blood cell, its environment and how well the body is manag ing these pH homoeostatic mechanisms.

The interdependence and close coordination of the many bodily functions, which work so well when we are in alkaline balance or health, may be upset by a chain reaction when any part of the system breaks down from metabolic acids which have not been properly eliminated through, respiration, perspiration or urination. If this chain reaction is too drastic, the red blood cells and body cells will become acidic and begin to biologically transform into other cellular forms - like bacteria or yeast.

The normal state of health is not a static condition, but a coordination response of many systems and mechanisms. Fluctuations occur within a very narrow pH range. An imbalance of a point or two on the acid/alkaline pH scale is extremely disruptive to health. A few percentiles of variation of oxygen concentration in the blood can impair function.

In the bloodstream, the slightest changes can be observed in the structures of the red and white blood cells, the level of cellular debris, the creation of cholesterol or calcium crystals, etc. If the blood sugar content is continually elevated due to body cell transformation or breakdown, the body chemistry becomes upset. An infinitesimal deficiency of sodium, calcium, potassium or magnesium, the alkaline buffers of the body can cause a problem in the function of many body parts.

We must keep our pH homoeostatic mechanism strong so that we can deal effectively with our world. If we are humming and the process of pH homeostasis is orderly, life continues; if we are honking and the pH homeostasis is continually being disrupted, our health is in jeopardy.
pH Homeostasis is a bit like balancing the books in accounting. It is maintained by balancing inputs with outputs.

How well we adapt in health and sickness is largely a function of the pH homoeostatic mechanism. The body's chemistry response to such subtle changes that a negative thought, an acidic food or drink, or eating too much food can be a problem for maintaining balance.
In 1988 an article of the New England Journal of Medicine stated that, "most major chronic disease probably results from the accumulation of environmental factors over time in genetically susceptible people."

In 1965, Rene Dubos, a medical historian and philosopher, pointed out that the body is imperfect in its attempts to adapt and maintain pH homeostasis. She said, "the mechanisms involved in regulating homeostasis don not always return the body's functions to their original state. They can be misdirected. The body only has the ability to adapt to insults for so long. When it can no longer adapt , degeneration sets in. Health is the state that the body attains when an individual responds adaptively and restores the body to its original integrity."
The term "homeostasis" was coined in the mid-1920's by the American physiologist, Walter B. Cannon. But he was building on a concept of balance that dated back to ancient Western, Eastern, and Middle Eastern civilizations.

The balance equals good health equation was first suggested by Hippocrates (460-375 BC) and the ancient Greeks. Hippocrates considered health to be a state of harmonious balance and disease a state of disharmony. He and his contemporaries believed that harmony and balance existed between organs, between bodily fluids, and between body and soul. When the body is out of harmony and balance, illness occurs.

Hippocrates studied the entire patient in his or her environment, noting the effects of climate, food, and occupation on health. "Our natures are the physicians of our diseases, " he said, describing the healing forces we all have within us as the healing power of Nature. It was the physician's objective to restore harmony with food, exercise, rest, and with medicinal remedies designed to remove the harmful acidic excesses. This conservative approach was designed to let nature do the healing and above all, as Hippocrates said, "to first do no harm."

The Greeks ideas on equilibrium and health evolved further under the philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BC). He felt that a healthy body worked through what he described as a hemostat, a device that returns the body to a state of equilibrium even when it is subjected to stimuli that disturbs this balance. Everything is tied to this state of equilibrium, including the psyche and emotions, and nothing could be regarded as a separate component.

To lead a healthy life, the condition of balance had to be maintained, This could only be achieved if the body had an adequate feedback system, a means by which signals were transmitted to different parts of the body to help move it back into balance when it moved too far off alkaline center.

This psychological viewpoint was shared by another philosopher, Epicurus (341-270 BC). In his writing he referred to psychological stress and suggested that an individual's quality of life could be improved by coping with what we would now describe as emotional stressors.

As early as about 120 AD in India, Eastern philosophers had reached similar ideas about the importance of balance in health. A general medical textbook from that time, the Caraks, described health as a balance of bodily elements know as dhatus, and a happy mental state called prasana.

The Middle Eastern approach incorporated the Hindu teachings with the Greco-Roman medical doctrine. Being base upon both religious and philosophical ideas, Islamic healing involved both body and soul.

Over 1000 years later, during the Middle Ages in Europe, good health was still linked to this notion of balanced physical, emotional, and spiritual state. To help people achieve this state, European hospitals were set up by religious orders and attached to abbeys, monasteries, and convents. Doctors prescribed diet, rest, sleep, exercise, and salt baths.

In 1600 Thomas Sydenham had begun classifying diseases, even though he believed disease was a result of imbalance, consistent with Hippocrates and Galen.
In 1628 Harvey traced the circulation of the blood, arguably perhaps the single greatest achievement in medicine.

In 1753 James Lind showed that Scurvy could be reversed with the limes that contain limonene - an antitoxic or antacid.

Doctors began to lose their way in 1796. In 1796 Benjamin Rush observed that all fevers were associated with flushed skin, he concluded that this was caused by distended capillaries and reasoned that the proximate cause of fever must be abnormal "convulsive action" in these vessels. He took this a step further and conclude that all fevers resulted from disturbances of capillaries and since the capillaries were part of the circulatory system, he concluded that a hypertension of the entire circulatory system was involved.

Rush proposed to reduce this convulsive action by "depletion" or bleeding. A reminder that the medical establishment's acceptance of bleeding exists today in the name of the British Journal "The Lancet" one of the leading medical journals in the world. Today bleeding is called phlebotomy.

Also, In 1796 Edward Jenner took the pus from the runny sores of sick cows and injected it into the blood of his "patients. He thought that since pus is seen routinely in all kinds of wounds, pus was seen as a necessary part of healing.

In 1788 vaccinia was the bacteria that medical science suggested caused cowpox.
In 1830 the development of the first modern day achromatic microscope.

In 1835, Harvard's Jacob Bigelow argued in a major address that in "the unbiased opinion of most medical men of sound judgement and long experience . . . the amount of death and disaster in the world would be less, if all disease were left to itself."

In 1840 Jacob Henle in his essay, "On Miasmata and Contagia" first formulated the modern germ theory. He suggested that disease seem to germinate, grow and spread - like a first point or origin, a seed, a bacterium. The germ theory said that minute living organism invade the body, multiply and cause disease and that a specific germ causes a specific disease.

In 1850 Samule Thomson said, " May the time soon come when men and women will become their own priest, physicians and lawyers - when self-government, equal rights and moral philosophy will take the place of all popular crafts of every description . . False theory and hypothesis constitute nearly the whole art of medicine."

In 1860 Louis Pasteur suggested that living organisms, not a chemical chain reaction caused fermentation, winning converts to the germ theory.

In 1881 an American scientist George Sternberg was the first to isolate the fungus, pneumococcus and the first to observe the white blood cells engulfing bacteria, a key to understanding the immune system.

In 1882 a German, Robert Koch isolated the tubercle bacillus and declared it as the bacterium that caused tuberculosis that further confirmed the germ theory of Pasteur.

In 1884, German scientist Friedrich Loeffler isolated the diphtheria bacillus from throats of patients, grew it on a special medium (labs today call this Loeffler's serum slope to grow the bacteria from suspected cases), and began carful experiments in animals that took several years. His work suggested that the bacteria themselves did not kill; the danger came from a toxin, diptherium, an acidic poison that the bacteria excreted as a waste product from sugar metabolism.

In 1885 Max von Pettenkofer insisted that Koch's bacteria were only one of many factors in the causation of disease. His dispute with Koch became increasingly bitter and passionate. Petterkofer determined to prove himself right, prepared test tubes thick with lethal cholera bacteria. Then he and several of his students drank them down. All survived. Petterkofer claimed victory that germs do not cause disease.

In 1889 Pasteur's proteges, Emile Roux and Alexandre Yersin grew broth thick with diphtheria bacteria and used compressed air to force broth through a filter of unglazed porcelain. The filter was designed by Charles Chamber land, a physicist working with Pasteur; though only a tool, the filter itself would prove to be immensely important. NO bacteria or solids could pass through the porcelain. Only liquid could. They then sterilized this liquid. It still killed. That proved that bacteria, an insoluble could not kill, but a soluble, an acidic toxin did the KILLING.

The cure from diphtheria was not in killing the bacteria but neutralizing the acids or excretions from the bacteria.

In 1900 Frederick Gates and intellect and Baptist Minister and an assistant to John D. Rockefeller, saw an opportunity to exploit the medical field because of its admitted uncertainty and ignorance of the time. He had organized many business ventures for the Rockfellers' and convinced John D Rockefeller to open the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. The Rockefeller Institute saw medicine itself as its field from its earliest existence scientists studying disease based upon the germ theory of Pasteur.

In 1901, William Henry Welch was hired by John D. Rockefeller to set up the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. William Henry Welch was steeped in the germ theory and established its strong hold on the medical model. You might call Dr. Welch the Father of American Medicine and the perpetrator of the Pasteurian Germ Theory.

After the civil war medicine had discovered drugs - such as quinine, digitalis and opium of which Oliver Wendell Homes the physician Father of the Supreme Court justice said, "I firmly believe that if the whole materia medica, as now used, could be sunk to the bottom fo the sea, it would be all the better for mankind - and all the worse for the fishes."

In 1911, the head of the school training French army doctors in public health said that germs alone were "powerless to create an epidemic." But it was too late, this particular view was now considered simply a minority opinion. The germ theory now had its hold on the governments of the world!

IN 1911, the medical establishments made up a story that Peyton Rous discovered a bacteria that caused cancer and received a Noble Prize for his discovery posthumous in 1966. This gave rise to the term virus named after Peyton Rous's bacteria. Peyton Rous never suggested this in any of his research that his bacteria caused disease let alone cancer. This story gave rise to a new group of bacteria called filterable bacteria that the medical community now refers to as virus - beginning 1996. There is NO scientific evidence that shows that virus's have ever caused ANY disease.

These ideas of balance were some distance from those of earlier societies that ascribed illness to the supernatural powers they believed governed their lives. The Babylonians, the Egyptians, the ancient Americans saw disease as an entity unto itself, a potent demon that struggled to dominate, attacked, penetrated, and possibly even killed its unfortunate host.
Offend the Gods, an ancestor, or an evil witch and be struck down as punishment. Lead a sinful life and you were tempting fate.

Of course, we perceive that these ideas about disease are no longer widely believed, which makes it all more the ironic that Pasteur's germ theory has had and still has a stranglehold on 19th, 20th and now 21st century medicine. As medical writer Alberto Seguin described in an article entitled, "The Concept of Disease," the demonic idea of disease reached its full height with the germ theory. It became possible to bring together rational and scientific thought with irrational tendency to personalize disease. The germ in what ever name it is called, West Nile Virus, Ebola, Hunta, HIV, Anthrax, SARS and now AVIAN, are the scientific demon, the curse, the lie and the fraud that is said to attack and kill!

If we will consider disease as a symptom of disease not the cause, then the germ is nothing more than an expression of imbalance and a biological transformation of what use to be organized to that which is changing into a new form. This was my discovery in 1994. I witnessed biological transformation as seen on pg. 126 of my book "Sick and Tired" the transformation of a rod bacteria back into a red blood cell and then back into a bacterial rod.

I knew for the first time that bacteria was not a demon, not an entity but a transformation, a new formation of a preceding form. Not the cause of disease but the expression of a change in the internal environment which had given rise to change. For several years I felt alone in this discovery until I learned of the works of the giants that proceeded me that had their finger on the magic of life.

Claude Bernard (1813-1878) "The terrain is everything the germ is nothing." And upon the death bed of Louis Pasteur admitting to Claude Bernard that he was right in 1895.
Antoine BeChamp (1816-1908) "Disease is born in us and from us."

Florence Nightingale - a famous nurse (1820 -1910) Mathias Schleiden and Theodor Schwann (1839) Gunther Enderlein ((1872- 1968) Walter B. Cannon (1871-1945) "Only by understanding the wisdom of the body shall we attain the mastery of disease and pain that will enable us to relieve the burden of the people."

Royal Raymond Rife (1888-1971)
Wilhelm Reich (1897 - 1957)
Gaston Naessans (1924-2005)

Philosophically speaking, Pasteur had an ally in Napoleon III, who came to power in 1852. The Emperor believed in a police state and in using complete control to rule. Pasteur's mechanistic idea of disease, finding the right cure for each germ, fit into this philosophy of control.

Giving the responsibility to the any government to cure disease is giving up control. It takes responsibility - and power - away from the individual. In the words of Antoine BeChamp, "there is nothing so false that does not contain some element of truth and so it is with the germ theory."

One of six of us will become diabetic
One of two of us will develop cancer
One of two of us will develop cardiovascular disease One of six couples will suffer from unexplained infertility.
One of seven women in the US will develop breast cancer.

We need to get out to the disease business. If we want to understand health, energy and vitality then we need to study the people who are healthy. Over the last 25 years I have been studying health and how it relates to the blood. Viewing live and dried blood is the pinnacle of understanding health and how to achieve health with alkaline foods, drinks, exercise, breathing, getting adequate rest, etc.

Now, I pray and hope that you will realize that we are all responsible for our own health - you alone. A medical practitioner can only help to relieve symptoms. Ultimately, you are the one who has to take charge. Health is a choice just as disease is a choice. You are responsible for what goes into your mouth and what comes out of your mouth, as well as for what you think, feel and do. Health is all about choices and consequences.

The health and energy of the human organism is the knowledge that are bodies are alkaline by design and acidic by function and the best way to maintain that alkaline design is through an alkaline lifestyle and diet.

Related Courses
· Live Blood Analysis (3 days)
· Live Blood Analysis (6 days)
· Live Blood Analysis (80 hours)
· Live Blood Analysis online course (1year)
· Colon Hydrotherapy Course 45 hours (6 Days)
· Cleansing Combo Pack
· Microscope Equipment

On A Competitive Balance Within the Endobiont

©Copyright by Thomas A. Dorman, MD

Introduction
This article will explore a radical approach to science and medicine. Though hardly known in North America, the practical applications of these matters have been current in Europe alternative medicine circles for decades. Whether this most intriguing of alternatives will gain a toehold in our society is an enigma. Watch it unfold! The clinical harvest may be large, scientific challenges enormous. As you will see from what follows, dear reader, the affront is threefold:The intellectual front. The ideas of these methods challenge the very core of biological sciences, virtually all of them;The philosophical milieu challenges not only the primacy of man in the universe but his very identity. Less of a challenge, although still important; Clinical decisions about these matters fall into the realm of the Hippocratic approach rather than the Platonic. This is a political counter-trend as has been discussed before.So let us set to. First, the reader will find an inventory of some of the basic concepts which will need to be demolished for this odyssey. Second there is an outline of the new concepts. Please remember, however, this is a popular article, not a textbook or a treatise. Accordingly, you will only find introductions to ideas and references. The rest is up to you.
Linear Identity
Man has sought the philosopher's stone, longevity, since time immemorial to preserve the conscious identity which makes up the essence of each of us. The idea was captured by Descartes in the phrase, I think, therefore I am ¹, or with Ayn Rand's succinct definition of man as a rational animal ², ³. The I fails ultimately because of individual mortality. After the grief of mortality we characteristically take solace in our progeny. However, not every son takes over where his father left off, so we embrace a broader family -- the tribe, the race, the nation, perhaps even our whole civilization. In our case we call it Western civilization. The ego's last defense is in the whole of the human species itself, in perpetuity. The dialectic where we should draw the line in this safety net for our ego, for our sense of identity, is the grist which operates the mill of social affairs and of spoken politics and history. It can be seen, therefore, that the psychological need for the concept of uniqueness of our species is diacritical for this pride, whether individual or collective. In contradiction, the theory of the life within, the endobiont of Professor Günther Enderlein, is predicated on accepting that our very organism is one of symbiosis.
Evolution
The Darwinian notion of evolution being a combination of gradual change of species on this planet through the mechanism of survival of the fittest has been challenged &sup4;. If the human, however, is a symbiosis of the genetic lineage of more than one organism, would we postulate an evolutionary duet down the millennia, nay, for millions of years? Incredible!
Life Cycles
Monomorphism is the concept that each species has one form. This is pretty much evident when looking at our own species or even at advanced examples of the plant kingdom. More "primitive" organisms, however, have multiple forms. We know, for instance, that the malaria parasite evolves through many stages, and several species, particularly parasites, have been described in which forms differ in their life cycles. In most cases life cycles are completed. In other instances the complete cycles are not mandatory -- that is to say, the organism can multiply in one form for prolonged periods. They proceed to what is usually called a sexual stage of multiplication only in propitious circumstances. The malaria parasite is the best example of this &sup5;. Science has recognized these cyclic phenomena, but they have not been fashionable models in recent years. In the case of bacteria and viruses, they have been denied. Our present odyssey calls for an acceptance of the concept of cycles. In addition, it posits that the host's internal environment influences growth and multiplication of the internal partner, the endobiont, as well as the sequence of its cyclic changes. The sequence is not necessarily unidirectional. What is meant by unidirectional? The example is the change of an insect's egg to a larva, thence to a cocoon, to an adult form, such as a butterfly, followed by sexual reproduction and the laying down of more eggs. Butterflies do not regress into the cocoon. The cycle is, therefore, unidirectional. Contrariwise, it is postulated that in certain circumstances the environment of micro-organisms can move an advanced form of an organism back to a more primitive one. In order not to confuse the concepts of ontological stages (larva, cocoon, butterfly, etc.) with this new one, the term valency has been introduced. The valency is recognized by its microscopic morphological complexity. Developmental and morphological valency is a new and difficult concept in microbiology.
Health and Disease
The allopathic concept of health is that a given state which is naturally preserved through the body's internal balance. Disease, on the other hand, is an invasion of this balance by an outside force, whether an injury, a metabolic defect, or an invading organism. (In Chinese medicine this is referred to as an External Pernicious Influence.) This contrasts with the homeopathic concept of health as one which is dependent on the inherent characteristics of the life concerned, and which can perhaps be modulated by subtle influences through harmonic stimuli, whether these be vibrational, through chemical imprinting or by other means &sup6;.
Isopathy
Isopathy is a term which refers to an adjustment in the balance between the symbiotic partners which constitute a life. The physician looks at the internal environment, the milieu, or bio-terrain as it is now called, through the microscope and with other means. The endobiont is coaxed into changing into a lower valency, the chondrit form. This is the essence of isopathic therapy.
Symbiosis
If you have been able to follow this essay, you will have come to realize that the term symbiosis is central to the discussion. Symbiosis is the cooperative joint living of two organisms for their mutual benefit in a form which is dependent on this interaction. Lichens are the most familiar example. Here, symbiosis exists between free-living bacteria and free fungal forms which in the lichen itself acquire a morphological form and exist in certain circumstances, such as adhering to rocks or tree bark, in a form which is quite different from the existence of each of the contributory organisms on their own. In fact, in the case of lichens the free-living fungi and bacteria are seldom seen alone, although it is possible to culture them and raise them in the experimental situation separately and even bring them together to re-form the lichen. Amazingly (and Oh, what a blow to the human ego!), it is suggested that our very existence constitutes such a symbiosis.
The Endobiont
So who, you will want to know, is the internal resident, this symbiontic partner? Before revealing this horrible secret, please be warned, dear reader, that the discoverer of the endobiont, an eminent German zoologist, has been maligned, his name virtually effaced from science for the very reason that he made this discovery. It is not a compliment to our ego. Contrary to what you might think or hope, science is not driven entirely by cold and indifferent logic. We have seen that revolutionary ideas have been subjected to long periods of suppression &sup7;. Well, here is the blow: The internal partner is a measly fungus. Günther Enderlein reported that he was able to culture a fungus by the name of Mucor racemosus (Fresen) from human blood. (The name Fresen refers to the individual who first described this organism, G. Fresen, a botanist, 1870.) This fungus has been found elsewhere, cultured, for instance, from mummified Egyptian pharaohs. But the fungus can be found in such mundane places as the crevices between the tiles of your bathroom where it is free living. The preposterous suggestion that this fungal organism is an internal partner to Homo sapiens was, you can see, not well received. An uncertain caveat to this is that Enderlein and subsequent researchers have attributed a similar relationship to several organisms, the fungus Aspergillus niger in particular. And so from our embarrassment of thinking that we have an unwelcome partner in our journey in the universe -- I am referring to our as that of our species -- we are now challenged with a whole zoo of internal creatures.
Monomorphism
Matters are becoming complicated because, in addition to the above challenges, Enderlein posited that the mini creatures in this zoo can change from one form (species) to another in certain circumstances. The terms viral, bacterial, and fungal refer, therefore, to phases or valencies as well as to species. Here we have a conceptual synthesis between the ablation of the concept of monomorphism and the introduction of the concept of cyclic changes between valencies. This paradigm shift is anathema to microbiology since Robert Koch8 initially defined the parameters we now take for gospel. This subject is delineated in Günther Enderlein's book Bakterien Cyclogenie9, and in his major work AKMON10.
Intellectual Shock
To take stock, then, of the intellectual shocks just applied to received opinion we might pen the following list:
· Species aren't necessarily species but symbioses.
· Phenotypes are not really an expression of genetics of one species but a composite.
· Life forms change in a sequel and the forms may cycle backwards at times.
· The concept of specificity in genetic coding for a species needs to be reassessed if the form and function are predicated on symbiosis.
· The whole business of evolution and Darwinism is untenable with this biological framework.
· A new category of disease is introduced. This is an imbalance between the symbiotic partners. This concept of disease is nothing short of revolutionary.
· By analogy: Copernicus challenged the centrality of planet earth and the solar system and Darwin the place of man on earth in God's image. How much larger is Günther Enderlein's blow to the ego of man based on this little list of paradigm shifts?
Dark Field Microscopy
If you have stayed with me thus far, dear reader, you are amongst the brave. Not only have I led you through an Alice-in-Wonderland maze of paradigm shifts, but I have so far not offered you a single reason to stay with me on this odyssey. But here it is. Look and you can see it! The amazing thing is that Günther Enderlein's work, theory and explanation is simply visible to the eye of the microscopist. Dark field microscopy was invented in 1837. Enderlein was a zoologist and makeshift clinician during the First World War. It fell to him, therefore, to combine clinical observation in the war theater with his knowledge of zoology, which was formed in a period before the conformity of the modern era, a time when essential ideas in science, those of Béchamps, Pasteur, Koch and Bernard were still alive, competing and not yet relegated to their definitive slots of winner and loser. Some of these issues have been addressed elsewhere11. And so, Seeing is believing. When Günther Enderlein started studying dark field microscopy he observed in living mammalian blood (of course, including human blood) the appearances of bacteria, branching, growing structures akin to the mycelia of fungi, let alone the appearance of moving, directed particles within the living blood, both in cells and the plasma. Platelets seemed to play an important role in this pantheon, in the new zoo. By watching and classifying changes under the microscope, he discovered that the endobiontic changes anticipated disease. A match was found between the initial microscopic appearances and the rate of change, on the one hand, and prognosis and category of disease on the other.We see, therefore, that in addition to prognosis, an impression can be formed of the likely disease category a person might suffer from. The forms visible under the microscope do not reach the highest potential valency of the internal partners, the endobiont, and, therefore, diagnosis of endobiontic species cannot be made microscopically. (Therefore, I comment on disease category, not diagnosis). However, assessments of valency, rate of change, endobiontic load, and observations about the internal milieu can indeed be made (and very usefully) with dark field microscopy. Herein lies the therapeutic potential.
Empiricism
The quintessence of the empiric method is a reliance on the scientist's observation. As scientists, we observe all kinds of things directly and indirectly in our experimental methods. But here we have a method of direct observation with the microscope. With suitable instrumentation and setting, anyone can see the changes for himself. What a paradox it is, then, that the profession of pathology, those doctors trained in the job of microscopic inspection and diagnosis, almost uniformly deny this whole scenario. The moving parts under the microscope are dismissed as Brownian movement (the true but random jiggling of tiny particles as the result of molecular interactions in fluids) or the extraneous invasion of the medium with bacteria from the air (not only could bacteria not grow fast enough for the changes we observe, but the patterns we observe in dark field microscopy matching health and disease, as outlined above, would hardly occur if the appearance were due to a random contamination from the air). Perhaps the aphorism, seeing is believing, should be reversed to, Believing is seeing! Because in this case the establishment will not acknowledge what is plain to the eye because of their beliefs. Before I become too hoity-toity in my condemnation of the establishment, one should interject that the threshold of belief was painful for this writer too. He feels nothing but sympathy for the disbelievers because these observations are so contrary to our imprinted scientistic (pseudo-scientific) belief system.
The Use of Hypothesis
So why, you might ask, embark on this antiestablishmentarian odyssey? The reason is simple. A doctor is in quest of the therapeutic yield. Perhaps this theoretical framework will lead to the management of ill health with new and effective methods. Some are destined to journey in quest of the golden fleece. We should remind ourselves that in our scientific tradition, hypothesis is a tool for a practical outcome. Each hypothesis is valuable only if it yields useful information. Karl Popper¹2; has defined these things for us.
Salvation
Günther Enderlein was so great a scientist that he drew the logical clinical conclusion from his zoological observations and developed a method for growing low valency Mucor and subsequently low valency forms of the alternate form of endobionts titled with the names of other species, such, for instance, as Aspergillus niger, in pure culture forms. These have been reduced to their essential protein moieties and are available as remedies from a company in Hoya, Germany, now called Sanum Kehlbeck. These remedies have been in use in Europe for about half a century with increasing degrees of sophistication, skill and therapeutic outcome. The intellectual divide between the Germanic lands and our own has been so wide that these marvelous remedies have barely penetrated into America and even the scientific knowledge about them has remained sub rosa. We owe, therefore, to the intellectual enthusiasm of a few English writers and enthusiasts, sometimes based on personal tragedies and salvation, that any information has become available. The battle (and seemingly a battle it was indeed) to introduce these remedies legally via the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of our government has just recently been concluded. We can, therefore, cash in on the dedication of these pioneers and bring some of these remedies to bear on our illnesses here at home. This writer is proud to support the introduction of the Sanum remedies to North America, even, if the quest for better health is a little like Jason's quest for the golden fleece. Symbolically, I see in Scylla the platonic socialist totalitarian snatching sailors from my boat and in Charybdis an intellectual vortex vacuuming out contrarian scientific paradigms.
Insurance
It goes without saying that Isopathic (Sanum) remedies are not insured benefits under Medicare or any known North American insurance. Individuals who choose practitioners using these methods fall into the category of self-reliant people who take responsibility for themselves. This is the ultimate in alternatives because of the scientific challenges.
Further Reading
Hidden Killers by Enby, Gosch and Sheehan is a paperback¹3; which tells much more of the tale. Explore! magazine also carries many articles on this subject. Readers who are not already subscribers will wish to join the ranks of regular adherents in order to stay in touch. Purchase the book, imbibe from it, and then if you are interested in help, consider asking for this approach to your health. It is not "the standard of care" for your doctor to initiate isopathic treatment in America at present. But then, of course, anything that is not done by the majority is not the standard of care. Here is an example of conformism through consensus.
References
1. Descartes, Renè. Discourse on Method, 1637.
2. Rand, Ayn. The Objectivist Ethics in the Virtue of Selfishness, 1964
3. Peikoff, Leonard. Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand. New York: Dutton, page 220, 1991.
4. Dr. Dorman's Practice Newsletter, October,1995
5. Dr. Dorman's Practice Newsletter, September 1992.
6. Gerber, Richard. Vibrational Medicine: New Choices for Healing Ourselves. Bear and Company, Santa Fe, New Mexico,1988.
7. Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Second Edition. The University of Chicago Press,1970.
8. Koch's Postulates: See footnotes to Practice Newsletter, September 1992.
9. Enderlein, Günther. Bakterien Cyclogenie, 1925. (In German, now available in English.)
10. Enderlein, Günther. AKMON . Ibica Publishers, 1957. (Also in German.)
11. Dr. Dorman's Practice Newsletter, October,1995, September, 1995.
12. Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery in 1934. Harper Torch Books, New York, 1969.

Microbes can and do revert to their primitive, symbiotic state

Luckily, these upgraded microbes can and do revert to their primitive, symbiotic state if the terrain becomes less toxic and regains its pH balance.

Enderlein developed special biological remedies to facilitate this “downgrading” process, whereby the harmful forms of the microbes revert back to their benign protein states. Instead of using antibiotics and other drugs with harmful side effects, Enderlein’s remedies (isopathics) stimulate the body’s immune system and promote self-healing.

This therapy, along with decreased intake of animal protein, supplementation with nutrient elements (such as minerals, unsaturated fatty acids, and vitamins, and the reintroduction of beneficial intestinal flora), helps bring back the internal milieu to its proper state. Having become reactive again, the patient is then in a much better state to receive energetic medications, such as homeopathic or naturopathic remedies.

Spontaneous remission eating ion unexplored terrain

Our working hypothesis is based thus on the acceptance that continual mitochondrial relevant metabolic damages favor malignant transformations. Spontaneous remission eating ions are explainable if these damages by nutritive biological influences to be prevented and repaired ability by reconciliation of the very special lack conditions (10,11).

However the research of spontaneous remission eating ions is scientific to today a taboo, which justifies webers in the article “puzzling healing” (12) with the fear around the consequences: “With it one cannot win laurel and endangered fast its scientific career.” The Oncologist scarce on is there already more pragmatic: “With it we could learn much from spontaneous remission eating ions over the healing processes in the body.”

Mali gnome a nutritives deficit?
(Lack selt at amino acids. Min., Neurol.) the beginning made Tallberg in its over 35 years research work for us: as Immunologist he knows that immune reactions are not sufficient alone, in order to eliminate larger tumor masses, but that nourishing factor in particular it determined amino acids and rare mineral with so-called spontaneous remission eating ions be taken part must. At the beginning of its attempts Tallberg knew a disappearing of solid tumors during its bio immune therapy, with which no trace of cancer tissue stayed, does not explain.

Zytolyti anti-bodies, effect local cells, macro phage inhibition factor, natural killer cells, killer cell indices and Phospholipid a2 investigations did not result in significant results (8). From my own investigations with cancer patients, who partly got before for many years chemotherapeutic agents given, I can read off nearly regularly a fall of the lymphocytes row in the Lymphocytes differentials, in particular the aid, Suppressor and NK-cells, so that in fact AID (S) iatrogenic had been produced.

Sarkome consequence of a amino acid deficit?

Tallberg encountered Dr. Howard Beard's report, which induced Sarcoma into the 1940er years with rats with arginin, Histidin and Lysin healed, whereby these amino acids were contaminated with tungsten salts and other rare metals at that time and these had together with the selected amino acids to the healing to contribute (13) (fig. 2).

Peter Schneider's Links collection

Links

• Energetisches Heilen in der Tiermedizin
• Homeopathy Home - "The Net's best homeopathic resource"
• Corinne I. Heitz, lic. phil. I, Holistic Practitioner, Naturopath (N.D.), Switzerland (English, German, Italian)
• BRL Laboratory for microscopic blood examination and biological terrain analysis (German, English)
• Ferdinand Ruzicka über Mykoplasmen - Kommensalen oder Kofaktor bei der Onkogenese (German)
• Ferdinand Ruzicka: Bacteria - Commensales or Cofactor of Oncogenesis? (English)
• Steven Brier's Autism Page (English)
  Andreas Bunkahle's Homöopathie Online (German)
• Naturheilkunde-Index
• PSI-Infos (Geistiges Heilen, Reinkarnation, u.a.) von Dr. Harald Wiesendanger (Lesetip: "Geistiges Heilen in der ärztlichen Praxis")

Oxy-Powder® Starter Cleansing Kit $97.85 [ learn more ] Our Starter Cleansing Kit contains Livatrex™, Paratrex®, and Oxy-Powder®.